Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
Search:
accession
locus
voucher
source
No data available in table
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries
intro
Olive text indicates a specimen that has not been
thoroughly examined (for example, for microscopic details) and marks other places in the text
where data is missing or uncertain.
The following material is based upon original research by R. E. Tulloss.
Since this material was extracted from a mixed collection that was dominated by material of L. sp-CMP0152, it is probably safe to assume that the cap was dominantly white or whitish with a tannish disc.
macrochemical tests
none recorded.
lamella trama
bilateral, divergent; ??.
basidia
??, 4-sterigmate, with sterigmata up to ??; clamps common and prominent.
[20/1/1] 4.5 - 6.0 (-6.3) × 3.0 - 3.6 (-3.8) μm, (L = 5.3 μm; W = 3.4 μm; Q = (1.29-) 1.31 - 1.80 (-1.87); Q = 1.52), ??, smooth or with low and broad warts, inamyloid, apparently elongate during early development, ??; apiculus sublateral, cylindric; contents ??; ?? in deposit.
material examined
U.S.A.: ARIZONA—Cochise Co. - CMP site #10, 30.viii.1993 F. H. Nishida s.n. [CMP3806-1] (RET 419-2).
discussion
Much more work is needed on this material.
It is possible that it is a taxon distinct from
Z.
sp-CMP0152 or that it is the same species,
but with spores developing abnormally.
For purposes of comparison, spore data (green
figure) for Z. sp-CMP0152 are compared
with the spores of the present possible taxon,
below.
A sporograph comparison with the Gulf Coast and
Caribbean species Z. subillinita follows:
??more??
citations
—R. E. Tulloss
editors
RET
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs
can be found here.
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer;
and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set.
Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences
(which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which
a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.
Spore data sets and their composite