| name | Limacella subglischra | ||||||||||||||||||||
| author | (S. Imai) S. Ito. 1959. Mycol. Fl. Japan 2(5): 251. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| name status | nomen acceptum | ||||||||||||||||||||
| synonyms |
≡Lepiota subglischra S. Imai, 1938a. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 43(1): 45. The editors of this site owe a great debt to Dr. Cornelis Bas whose famous cigar box files of Amanita nomenclatural information gathered over three or more decades were made available to RET for computerization and make up the lion's share of the nomenclatural information presented on this site. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| MycoBank nos. | 283130, 279219 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| GenBank nos. |
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later. Search:
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries | ||||||||||||||||||||
| holotypes | SAPA?? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| intro |
The following text may make multiple use of each data field. The field may contain magenta text presenting data from a type study and/or revision of other original material cited in the protolog of the present taxon. Macroscopic descriptions in magenta are a combination of data from the protolog and additional observations made on the exiccata during revision of the cited original material. The same field may also contain black text, which is data from a revision of the present taxon (including non-type material and/or material not cited in the protolog). Paragraphs of black text will be labeled if further subdivision of this text is appropriate. Olive text indicates a specimen that has not been thoroughly examined (for example, for microscopic details) and marks other places in the text where data is missing or uncertain. The following material is derived from the protolog of the present species. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| pileus | from protolog: 25–35 mm wide, yellow to pale orange, pallid near margin, at first subumbonate, umbonate when expanded, very viscid; context gray, fleshy; margin not described; gluten pile concolorous with pileus. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| lamellae | from protolog: free, crowded, pale yellow, 3 mm broad; lamellulae not described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| stipe | from protolog: 35 – 55 × 3 – 5 mm, dry and white above annular zone, pale yellow and viscid below, subcylindric, slightly narrowing upward; bulb not described; context solid to stuffed. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| odor/taste | from protolog: Odor and taste lacking. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| macrochemical tests |
none described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| pileus context | not described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| lamella trama | not described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| subhymenium | not described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| basidia | not described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| gluten layer | not described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| stipe context | not described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| lamella edge tissue | not described. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| basidiospores | from protolog: 3–4.5 × 3-4.5 µm, hyaline, colorless, smooth, inamyloid, ?globose; apiculus not described; contents not described; white in deposit. [Note: Undoubtedly, the spores are not perfectly globose. A sporograph cannot be generated from this data.—ed.] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ecology | from protolog: In forest. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| material examined | from protolog: JAPAN: HOKKAIDO—Sapporo - Ishikari, 28.viii.1955 Imai s.n. (?holotype, SAPA). | ||||||||||||||||||||
| citations | —R. E. Tulloss | ||||||||||||||||||||
| editors | RET | ||||||||||||||||||||
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs can be found here.
| name | Limacella subglischra |
| bottom links | [ Keys & Checklists ] |
| name | Limacella subglischra |
| bottom links | [ Keys & Checklists ] |
Spore data sets and their composite
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer; and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set. Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences (which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.
Text and User-Generated Sporographs are published under the Creative Commons License.
In the case of a taxon page, image credits are on the 'image' tab.