Limacella solidipes - Amanitaceae.org - Taxonomy and Morphology of Amanita and Limacella
[print] [map]
name Limacella solidipes
name status nomen acceptum
author (Peck) H. V. Sm.
english name Peck's Vanguard Limacella
intro The following is derived from the description of Smith (1945 ).
cap The cap of L. solidipes is 30 – 70 mm wide, white at first, becoming "pale pinkish buff" (very pale tan), broadly convex to plane, with surface subrimose in age, but never fibrillose or scaly, always opaque and dull, and viscid when moist.  The cap's flesh is white, and 5± mm thick above the stem.  The cap's margin was not described.  Considering the mention of viscidity and what little is known about the microscopic structure of the gluten layer, the cap was probably originally glutinous.
gills The gills are attached to stipe by narrow tooth or are simply approximate, and crowded.  They exhibit no color change when cut or broken.  The short gills were not described.
stem The stem is 80 – 100 × 10 – 12 mm, cylindric, glabrous above the partial veil and beaded with hyaline droplets, sparsely fibrillose below partial veil, and never scaly.  A bulb is absent from the stem or exists only as a slight expansion of the stem's base.  The stem's flesh is solid and firm.  There is a ring on the stem that is superior, white, persistent, ample, and skirt-like.  No gluten layer was described on the stem.
odor/taste Odor and taste of this species are reportedly both strongly of flour or meal ("farinaceous").
spores The spores reportedly measure 4 – 5 × 4 – 5 µm and are estimated to be between globose and broadly ellipsoid. The reaction in Melzer's Reagent was not reported, but the spores are probably inamyloid.  Clamp connections were seen in the lamella trama; hence, they are probably present at the bases of basidia.
discussion The presence of a membranous, persistent ring on the stem and the reported microscopic characters of the hyphae of the presumed gluten layer suggest the placement of the present species in L. sect. Amanitellae.

Smith thought that L. mcmurphyi might be a synonym of the present species; however, our examination of the type of the latter has not been able to confirm that it is appropriately placed in sect. Amanitellae.  Further study is necessary.—R. E. Tulloss
brief editors RET

[top]