Amanita luteivolvata - Amanitaceae.org - Taxonomy and Morphology of Amanita and Limacella
[print] [map]
name Amanita luteivolvata
name status nomen acceptum
author O. K. Mill.
english name "Yellow-Patched Limbed-Lepidella"
intro

The following is based on the original description of Miller (1992).

cap The cap of Amanita luteivolvata is 30 - 53 mm wide, convex to broadly convex, plane or slightly decurved margin in age, viscid, ivory white, glabrous, with a nonstriate and appendiculate margin [appears to noticeably extend beyond gills in original description's photograph].  The volva remnants are present as submembranous, patches of buff to yellow to orange-buff over the center.  The flesh is firm and white.
gills The gills are narrowly attached, subdistant, narrow to medium broad in age, white, with edge minutely fimbriate and white.  The short gills are reported in one tier.
stem The stem is 42 - 75 × 4 -12 mm, cylindric, stuffed, smooth, white, bearing white, fragile, superior, ragged, appressed remains of a ring just below the gills.  The volva is present as very soft, thick, submembranous, buff to yellow to orange-buff ring of yellow tissue just below the rim of the marginate bulb.  The bulb is subglobose, 9 -11 × 13 - 16 mm, with fine white threads of hyphae at the base.  The flesh is firm.  The flesh in the bulb is white and firm.  The central cylinder often appears water-soaked.
odor/taste The odor is "unpleasant, medicinal to stale, or like old hambones."
spores The spores measure (9-) 10 - 13 (-14) × (5-) 5.5 - 7.5 (8.6) µm and are ellipsoid to elongate to cylindric and amyloid.  Clamps apparently absent at bases of basidia.
discussion

Originally described from the state of Western Australia in association with Eucalyptus, Allocasuarina, and with imported Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) in one site.

Miller suggests placement of this species in Amanita stirps Preissii and suggests that it is most closely related to Amanita sublutea (Cleland) E.-J. Gilbert.  I think this placement is more strongly supported than Miller suggests, and since buff may be the color that results from exposure to sunlight of an originally bright-colored volva, a thorough morphological comparison of A. sublutea and A. luteivolvata would be very desirable.—R. E. Tulloss

brief editors RET

[top]